|
|
Manjula said:
>IMHO there is already a vocabulary available for making the distinction
>between definition and comment -ISO1179.
>I put together a draft RDF/XML encoding awhile ago at:
>http://www.schemas-forum.org/registry/schemas/ISO-11179/
>NB -the encoding needs to be reviewed in light of recent discussions
I agree. Using this tag would be more appropriate for a definition.
Thanks to everyone who corrrected me regarding the eor:comment and
the rdfs:comment tag. My mistake. You are absolutely right.
This is probably more trouble than it is worth. To correct this
situation once and for all it seems we would have to
move what is in the eor:comment tags to rdfs:comment tags and move
what is in the rdfs:comment to a iso11179:definition tag (or similar tag).
No telling who would yell 'fire' were this actually done.
Unless someone else feels differently I suggest we let this issue drop.
Regards,
Harry
|
|
|
|