Tom, et al.:
I think this ought to be part of the process document--why make people look
in two places for criteria? Perhaps the best think might be for me to try
and do it, and we can consider the results in Tokyo? I can attempt (notice
I didn't say "promise") to get it out ahead of time so Rebecca can comment
if she chooses.
Diane
At 12:06 PM 10/9/2001 +0200, you wrote:
>It is not clear to me who "owns" this document now, so it is up for
>grabs... I completely agree with the idea of simplifying the points.
>Would it be simplest to fold these points into
>http://dublincore.org/usage/documents/process/? In fact, the numbering
>in the Process document seems to be off, so it looks like we might
>squeeze them in as the missing Section 3.3...?
>
>Tom
>
>On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Andy Powell wrote:
> > A couple of comments on
> >
> > http://dublincore.org/usage/documents/criteria/
> >
> > In 1., I'd prefer to see 'defined' rather than 'described' in the first
> > sentence.
> >
> > I don't understand 3. and wouldn't know how to evaluate a proposal against
> > this criteria! I think we should drop this.
> >
> > I would have thought that 5 and 6 could be merged.
> >
> > I would have thought that 2 and 7 could be merged.
> >
> > If we did all that we'd only have 4 criteria - which has got to be a good
> > thing hasn't it! :-)
> >
> > Andy
> > --
> > Distributed Systems and Services
> > UKOLN, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK [log in to unmask]
> > http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/a.powell Voice: +44 1225 323933
> > Resource Discovery Network http://www.rdn.ac.uk/ Fax: +44 1225 826838
> >
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________
>Dr. Thomas
>Baker [log in to unmask]
>Birlinghoven Library, Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft
>Schloss
>Birlinghoven +49-2241-14-2352
>53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax
>+49-2241-14-2619
|