oh, deary me, seems that all this fancy book learning hasn't really progressed(!) us terribly far as of yet....all of these "things" (and, ok, as suggested, this word may be part of the problem though, in the world of the bookish, it seems implausible that any other would be any less problematic) that we either may or may not believe (yikes!) in do ACTUALLY EXIST...and the problem becomes what actually consitutes an existence (woe! how much my life!) and surely apparently traceable, within particular bounds (i.e. those that seek to trace them) convergences of effects that happen repeatedly, again and again, and again and again...at least give the impression of stability...and why, then, are we unable to take this apparent stability as constitutive of something that is actually there?? which, of course, it may not be. Ok, so we don't believe (gah!)in thatcherism...though, again, we can find traces, probably still feel effects, of whatever it is that we imagine (assuming we !
can be bothered) thatcherism to be....now, ok, again, we now don't believe in post-structuralism. this is not possible - assuming you want to explain what it is, whatever it is, that WE (and here i claim my crit-geog-solidarity badge) do...or have done. Go on, i dare you!! Except, of course, we are all supremely confident, verging on smug, about what we do, whatever it is, and thus the notion that it might just be rubbish need not trouble us unduly! There are enough of us to read each others' "stuff"......
Come on, let's break stuff!!
_________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE Donotreply.com Email account at...
http://www.evilemail.com
http://Donotreply.com - Did you think I was kidding?
_________________________________________________________
|