Falk,
you should reply to the argument by Robert Twiss. The dimensional
consideration seems to be crucial for you, and the rest is only to find
WHERE is the mistake. The arguments by Dugald Carmichael also seem to be
crucial, but they are not so evident.
You should not avoid a direct answer to R. Twiss. His argument is not a
" whimsical topic" as you wrote. In fact, your "Open letter" takes us
away. So, please reply.
Cheers
Slava
Robert Twiss wrote:
>
> Seems to me a simple dimensional analysis shows the fallacy of Koenemann's argument:
.................................................
..................
--
Dr. Vladislav ALEKSEEV
Institute of Geology and Paleontology
Karl-Franzens University of Graz
Heinrichstrasse 26
A-8010 Graz, Austria
Tel.: +43-316-380-8725
Fax: +43-316-380-9870
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
|