Nope. Even after a refresh, here's what's there:
4.6. Categories of recommendation
4.6.1. CROSS-DOMAIN. Terms of general use and broad interest across domains.
4.6.2. DOMAIN-SPECIFIC. Terms of interest to a limited domain or set of
domains.
4.7. Categories not recommended but able to be registered
4.7.1. NON-CONFORMING. Proposed terms found not to be in conformance with
principles, but registered as used by one or more implementations
4.7.2. OBSOLETE. For terms that have been superseded, deprecated, or
rendered obsolete. Such terms will remain in the registry for use in
interpreting legacy metadata.
instead of
4.6. Categories of recommendation
4.6.1. CROSS-DOMAIN. Terms of general use and broad interest across domains.
4.6.2. DOMAIN-SPECIFIC. Terms of interest to a limited domain or set of
domains.
4.6.3. OBSOLETE. Terms that have been superseded, deprecated, or rendered
obsolete. Such terms will remain in the registry for use in interpreting
legacy metadata.
Stuart
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Stuart A. Sutton, Associate Professor
The Information School of the University of Washington
Suite 370, Mary Gates Hall, Box 352840
Seattle, WA 98195-2840
(206) 685-6618(V) (206) 616-3152(F)
http://www.iSchool.washington.edu
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
-----Original Message-----
From: Diane I. Hillmann [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 5:37 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Mission and Principles, revised draftx
Stuart:
Just back from ALA and plowing through messages. I see the changes
there--is your browser perhaps viewing a cached document?
Diane
>Diane, I'm confused. The document you point to doesn't
>include any change to these sections from the last revision.
>
>Stuart
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Diane I. Hillmann [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 11:28 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Mission and Principles, revised draftx
>
>Done. See: http://128.253.121.110/DC-UB/DC-UBprocess3.html
>
>Diane
>[a.k.a., "Her Crankiness"]
>
>At 12:25 PM 6/12/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>>Sorry, Diane ... don't mean to make you cranky :-(. I would suggest that
>>we take section 4.7.2 and make it 4.6.3 under categories of recommendation
>>and eliminate all of the remainder of 4.7.
>>
>>4.6. Categories of recommendation
>> 4.6.1. CROSS-DOMAIN. Terms of general use and broad interest
>> across domains.
>> 4.6.2. DOMAIN-SPECIFIC. Terms of interest to a limited domain or
>> set of domains.
>> 4.6.3. OBSOLETE. For terms that have been superseded,
>> deprecated, or rendered obsolete. Such terms will remain in
>> the registry for use in interpreting legacy metadata.
>>
>>I am assuming that things that are rendered obsolete were once
>>DCMI Recommendations. Therefore a DCMI Recommendation that
>>a term be made Obsolete is OK--it is nevertheless a recommendation.
>>The elimination of a category of non-conforming does not preclude
>>the inclusion of such terms in the registry if we think that is
>appropriate.
>>They would just be there without a DCMI Recommended status.
>>
>>Stuart
|