Tom, the "non-conforming" language is in Diane's revised draft at
4.7.1:
http://128.253.121.110/DC-UB/DC-UBprocess3.html
Stuart
> I know that the process document still has this notion of
> "non-acceptance" or "non-recommendation" which means nothing
> more than that a proposal isn't going to become a DCMI Recommendation.
> I'd really like to have us consider dropping this notion as a specific
> status
> --drop it both literally and from the UB process document leaving us
> with a process in which the UB either brings a proposal forward as a
> Recommendation (X-Domain, Domain-Specific, Obsolete) or it does
> not (with explanation of why not).
I agree. Are you referring to the notion of "non-conforming"? I thought
we had dropped that already. What part of the Process document are you
referring to?
Tom
____________________________________________________________________________
___
Dr. Thomas Baker
[log in to unmask]
GMD Library
Schloss Birlinghoven
+49-2241-14-2352
53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax
+49-2241-14-2619
|