To me nobody an no body is impaired, impairment is a measurement of
relativity, by which one requires a standard or datum to measure impairment
against, once one establishes such a paradigm of perfection, completeness or
wholeness, one has already started on the road to discrimination.
Difference is all that I recognise.
If you recall my parable about the forest and trees which I posted a while
ago you might see what I getting at.
Larry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The Disability-Research Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Carol Hamilton
> Sent: 02 June 2001 00:02
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: reply
>
>
> On Wednesday 30th May Anita wrote:
>
> Just in case my query was not clear enough, let me repeat it again.
> What I wish to understand the position of social model on the
> impaired body.
> Is / Should the material body be important to the disability theory?
> Thanks
> Anita
>
> I'm also interested in reponses to this question
>
> Cheers carol
>
>
> --
>
> ________________End of message______________________
>
> Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
> are now located at:
>
> www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
>
> You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
>
________________End of message______________________
Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
|