On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Dan Brickley wrote:
> these are fine by me, so long as we batch (2) and (3) by date-stamped (or
> otherwise uniq'd) snapshot; I'm really worried by the idea that we can
> just keep pouring new stuff into a single namespace.
Dan,
I still don't get it!
Please explain the scenario(s) under which new uniq'd versions of
namespace URIs are used and, assuming that changes to the semantics of
some of the names in the namespace are one cause of creating a new uniq'd
namespace URI, what happens to those names that haven't changed.
I.e., under what circumstances do you forsee us creating
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.2/
and what will happen to those names in the 1.1 namespace that haven't
changed?
Andy
--
Distributed Systems and Services
UKOLN, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK [log in to unmask]
http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/a.powell Voice: +44 1225 323933
Resource Discovery Network http://www.rdn.ac.uk/ Fax: +44 1225 826838
|