On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Aaron Swartz wrote:
> I'd be perfectly happy with:
>
> http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
> http://purl.org/dc/terms/
> http://purl.org/dc/type/
>
> For dcmitype, none of your choices include the /dc/ which I think is a
> mistake.
Agreed. (A typo I guess).
> Also, if we're keeping things at the PURL, I think it's significant
> enough distinction that it's a "vocabulary" that we don't need the
> redundancy. I also feel the dcmi is redundant too.
I originally suggested 'dcmitype' rather than 'type' because DCMIType is
the 'name' of the encoding scheme - see
http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmes-qualifiers/#type
Andy
--
Distributed Systems and Services
UKOLN, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK [log in to unmask]
http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/a.powell Voice: +44 1225 323933
Resource Discovery Network http://www.rdn.ac.uk/ Fax: +44 1225 826838
|