Dan Brickley <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> In fact I'd be inclined to go with a minimalist, static RDDL-plus-RDF at
> the namespace URI, then put ever-growing RDDL directories (pointing to
> translations etc) in a 'see also' document nearby.
The only problem I have with that is the fact that RDDL has no seeAlso
facilities, so RDDL processors will miss out on all the goods!
--
[ Aaron Swartz | [log in to unmask] | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
|