Dear all,
The study of about 50 000 bone remains from the roman town of Paris (PhD in
discertation phase) indicates that in this particular context maximum
species richness (not diversity as these species are rare) is attained
around 6 000 NISP. The number of species in this hand collected sample
grows following a logarithmic curve with a plateau of about 30 species
(including fish and micromammals) around 6 000 NISP. Herd management drown
from mandibular ages was particulary informative on samples per period per
settlement with an MNI ranging from 34 to 102 for caprines and 34 to 108
for pigs.
Bone measurements are better illustrated with the largest samples as we
get a clearer idea of the fluctuation of the measurements of a given bone
besides increasing the probability of encountering whole bones. Large
samples of bones allowed measuring intrasamlpe diversity for a given
period; this helps afterwards for spotting true diachronic variability in
addition to making inferences about population heterogenity (depending on
sex and animal format).
Of course dealing with multiple contexts and large samples doesn't always
guarantee making things clearer as complications due to the type of
accumulation and spatial variability may occur... (this complexity is
undoubtedly interesting in itself and deserves developing even if this is
pretty difficult for the time been for roman contexts as little is known
about the functionning of the towns of this period at this scale).
All this stands for this particular roman context with samples providing
from habitats and their immediate surroundings and which reflect
then domestic butchery and meat consumption for a given habitat of the
town. Large layers of cattle butchery refuse for instance, don't deserve
full study as they don't reflect food intake, in that case we were only
concerned with mandibular ages and bones measurements in addition to
qualitative description of butchering process. One may also check the MNI
for an estimation of the number of processed cattle within this layer even
if this does not reflect the real number as the butchery refuse must have
been carried out of the town or dumped straight in the river (The butchery,
tanning and bone working seems to occur close to the river).
Tarek OUESLATI (PhD student)
Archéozoologie et Histoire des sociétés
Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle
Lab. d'Anat. Comparée
55 rue Buffon
75005 Paris
|