JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for RADSTATS Archives


RADSTATS Archives

RADSTATS Archives


RADSTATS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

RADSTATS Home

RADSTATS Home

RADSTATS  2001

RADSTATS 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Section 59

From:

"stuart.bowman" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

stuart.bowman

Date:

Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:09:26 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (80 lines)

Here's the full text, available on the Guardian Unlimited website where all
Guardian and Observer articles can be found.


Milburn bans 'awkward' NHS reports
Anthony Browne, health editor
Observer

Sunday January 28, 2001


The Government plans to make independent scrutiny of the National Health
Service a criminal offence in a move described as 'control freakery' and
'totalitarian' by health campaigners.

Health Secretary Alan Milburn wants to outlaw awkward independent reports on
standards and treatment in the NHS, and rely on official studies to monitor
all aspects of the service. Any group or individual trying to produce an
independent report will be subject to heavy fines.

The Minister also wants to disclose patients' medical records to third
parties for research purposes - even if they and their doctors object.

Patients' groups and doctors have accused Milburn of being 'Orwellian' and
'undemocratic' in the new Health and Social Care Bill. Clause 59 of the
Bill, to be examined by Parliament this week, follows embarrassing reports
into NHS care. It will mean patient and consumer groups will not be able to
do spot checks on hospitals or clinics, or measure the effect of treatments.
The Government will have powers to control the publication of reports into
doctors' workloads, waiting times, conditions in hospitals and the quality
of care. Studies into deaths resulting from infections picked up in hospital
would be banned unless permitted by the Minister.

Any individual or patient group breaking the rules will be fined up to
£5,000. 'It is a totalitarian approach, it is not democratic. It is total
control freakery,' said Dr Fleur Fisher, chairman of the British Medical
Association's Foundation for Aids and the BMA's former head of ethics. 'The
immense width of these powers are scary. It's like waking up and finding you
are in 1984,' she said.

The Department of Health insists it needs the powers to stop patient
information being used against the interests of patients. A spokesman said:
'Use of the powers must be approved by Parliament and use of information
must be to improve patient care or otherwise be in the public interest.'

Philip Stephens, of the health information company IMS Health, said the
powers threatened 'the ability of patient organisations, academics and the
drugs industry to undertake important research to improve the quality of
patient care'. 

Last week the Government abolished the Patient's Charter and the rights
enshrined in it. Milburn is also abolishing Community Health Councils, the
only statutory patient watchdogs. The College of Health, an advice line that
helps patients avoid excessive waiting times, has lost its public funding.

Roger Goss, director of Patient Concern, said: 'Milburn wants to create the
appearance of greater patient involvement, while trying to make sure there
are no effective bodies criticising his efforts to smarten the NHS.'

The Community Health Councils are being replaced by much weaker Patients'
Advocates, appointed by the hospital and reporting to the chief executive.
The Government has replaced the Patient's Charter with ' Your Guide to the
NHS '. Instead of giving 'rights', it tells patients what they can 'expect',
emphasising patients' responsibilities in terms of not missing appointments,
doing exercise, and practising safe sex.

When he announced plans to abolish the Patient's Charter, the then Health
Secretary Frank Dobson said: 'The old Patient's Charter focused too much on
patients' rights. It encouraged consumerism, but made health professionals
defensive.' 

******************************************************
Please think before you press the 'Reply' button!   Note that if you press
the 'Reply' button your message will go the individual who posted this message
not to the list.  With many mailers you will have a 'Reply-to-All' button that
will send automatically to the list address of <[log in to unmask]>.  The
Radstats list is set up for public discussion so please be generous with your
thoughts and share them us all.
*******************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager