on 6/2/01 12:35 PM, John Kinsella at [log in to unmask] wrote:
> not one person from outside oz who has contacted me after reading it has read
> the article that way. you seem to be intentionally misreading. i just don't
> say
> that, jill - vif you look at the piece as a whole. it is clear that i have
> focussed on something that interests me etc.
>
Sorry, but no, not at all 'intentionally' - just concerned, genuinely
concerned, about an impression that appears to have been created by context
etc etc. Unfortunately, impressions matter for all the obvious problematic
reasons. If I've hammered it a bit it was only because of that. I guess a
bit of passion is very uncool. So I'll leave it to others now - if they care
to. We shall have to agree to disagree. I'm not interested in a war or even
a scrap. I shall leave the field now to write and read, that's what really
interests me - the day is slipping away.
Best,
Jill
_________________________________
Jill Jones
50 Ruby Street
Marrickville NSW 2204
AUSTRALIA
[log in to unmask]
http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~jpjones
|