nor i - in wars - on any level. passion of beliefs is something i understand.
respect your speaking!! that's what it's all about. dialogue, community etc.
best,
jk
Jill Jones wrote:
> on 6/2/01 12:35 PM, John Kinsella at [log in to unmask] wrote:
>
> > not one person from outside oz who has contacted me after reading it has read
> > the article that way. you seem to be intentionally misreading. i just don't
> > say
> > that, jill - vif you look at the piece as a whole. it is clear that i have
> > focussed on something that interests me etc.
> >
>
> Sorry, but no, not at all 'intentionally' - just concerned, genuinely
> concerned, about an impression that appears to have been created by context
> etc etc. Unfortunately, impressions matter for all the obvious problematic
> reasons. If I've hammered it a bit it was only because of that. I guess a
> bit of passion is very uncool. So I'll leave it to others now - if they care
> to. We shall have to agree to disagree. I'm not interested in a war or even
> a scrap. I shall leave the field now to write and read, that's what really
> interests me - the day is slipping away.
>
> Best,
> Jill
>
> _________________________________
> Jill Jones
> 50 Ruby Street
> Marrickville NSW 2204
> AUSTRALIA
>
> [log in to unmask]
> http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~jpjones
|