Another side of this business of attachments to postings to lists is that
many of us automatically delete messages with attachments without opening -
its a security matter!!
Alan's suggestion of the URL is a better option. Those of us who don't have
access to the URL can reply to the original posting and ask for the
attachment (or would that mean that we'd have to think too much before
posting???)
Regards
Laurie
Laurie Fenwick
University of Sunderland Library
[log in to unmask]
[[log in to unmask]]
http://www.geocities.com/laurie_fenwick
[http://lauriefenwick.freeservers.com]
Tel: +44 (0)191 515 3570 Fax: +44 (0)191 515 2913
-----Original Message-----
From: A general Library and Information Science list for news and
discussion. [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Alan Reeves
<<<snip>>>
If more information is available on any topic of a posting can I suggest
that the sender gives us the URL and we can get it if we are interested.
Paying BT for several minutes of connect time just to receive something that
I might be interested in (twice) when I could have got it from the URL at my
convenience is annoying.
<snip>
|