>From: JMC <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: Film-Philosophy Salon <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: slowandfast
>Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 06:25:51 -0500
>
>Vit,
>
>For theory of velocity (fast and slow), look to Deleuze and Guattari--try
>_A
>Thousand Plateaus_.
not sure at all///dg books on lemmnic prop better. lot's betters./
i tried 2 speak fast in code hx. try that in your computer. no worry. of
course, of course./
>
>http://lists.village.virginia.edu/~spoons/d-g_html/d-g.html
>
>
>
>
>For non-Kantian aesthetics, try Hegel.
sadness hegel can help./
>
>For a cultural critique of taste, try Nietzsche.
Nietzsche -not critical? Nietschz e has many readers, anyway./
some take it bad, some take it fresh, some,, cool, sadly, nobody sees what's
hiding behind the beauty of his book. Do not tell him he critical, he
creator. (bad medication-?-) or laugh of the ZoharathoustrrA, of his own,
zown?./ fast nietzsche, accurate, dj can use that. and they do it now./
>
>For a theory of excess, try Bataille.
don't (m-b), t-ry Bataille, try MIT self help, no,?, if they can disagree,
they have this limit you look 4./
- (matter, and motion, and motion. ad lib infinitash./)
>
>
>
>For pre-Kantian aesthetics, post-Cartesian and post Lockean theories may be
>useful.
m-b not. Cartesyan /no i. Spinoza impressed by Cartesyan, it was so i
believe honestly./..
>
>
>What are you looking to do?
>
>JMC
lot's of love to whomever reads that, in this sense. the sense that you
wanna discover, and with the limit that you cannot help to ask./-try that.
this message was coded. not done in a lot of time at dispostionalityck.
cra.- respect if not love, if not, i don't know anything more to tall you
this hour.
FILM-PHILO./bye.. no more comical film would be a very interesting thing to
discussss (chat) next week.,a day.
Fili Houtman./
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
|