i purposely tried to sidestep the quicksand of various
only partly comensurable traidtional uses of the term
[for example, in one platonic version diegesis, as the poet's
recounting of an event, is distinguished from mimesis in
which the event is acted out . . . in my version this is a
distinction entirely within the area of *narration* having
to do only with the MEANS of communicating a diegesis,
and having nothing to do with the constitution of the
diegesis itself]
it helps to remember that the term has been apropriated
in different ways . . . as to how either of these relate to
Metz's 'proprioceptive' -- i have to admit that i have
no clue
m
|