Yes, video has a different aesthetic then film and might not be as pleasing
but you still continue to evade the economics issue in your argument for film
vs. video. The means of production and distribution are owned by companies
with large sums of money and most if not all films made in the US. are
for-profit. Many films might not have been made if they were not shot on
video, "Bamboozled" as one example and there are many more.
|