hi sukbir, and sorry for surface-talkin about *myself again*, and *again*,
wanna tell ya all, this fact came clear to me one day, is that deleuze book
on cinema were really written _cinematically_, i don't require to anybody to
do so when writing "about" cinema, but it's nevertheless true that you can
imagine sometimes artists can suffer, from the critiques way of talking
about their cherished very hard to do, works. but i require it to my own
writing, and i suggest critics of this list to understand such endeavours,
not because they are mine, and that i am schizo, or narcissic, such blasey
things and tiresome, but because i am struggling with other people, coming
from the past, or looming from the future, who have or and will be
experimenting these and other more important yet, things to come to the
critiques eye.
i use ellipse mb also becoz i don't feel well on this list, which is full of
what NIetszce called the Superior Men, to distinguish them from the
Aristocrat of the Soul, etc.
btw, you mentioned last day the Mahabaratta film by Peter Brooks dancers,
whose esthetic in my youth I appreciated so much. Do you know of other
INdian MOvie dealing with religious work, in whatever you think is not just
entertainment movie.
THank YOu.
FYlya.
>
>In a message dated 9/7/2001 1:17:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>[log in to unmask] writes:
>
><< To return to Fili, he doesn't stand accused of any of this at all. His
> problem seems to me to be some kind of willful aphasia - a sort of a
>failed
> sleight at ellipsis.
>
> Sukhbir >>
>
>
>aieeee! OY! and a big YIKES!
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
|