JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHYSIO Archives


PHYSIO Archives

PHYSIO Archives


PHYSIO@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHYSIO Home

PHYSIO Home

PHYSIO  April 2000

PHYSIO April 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

PHYSIOLOGY OF PILATES?

From:

[log in to unmask]

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Mon, 3 Apr 2000 22:50:21 EDT

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (110 lines)

On 4/3/00, Trevor Allen<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Mel Siff:

<Anyway, without entering into an extremely long analysis of every comment,
I cannot see any scientific errors of note in my comments on the dubious
physiology underlying Pilates training or the inaccurate or imprecise
remarks made by Trevor Allen that seemed to be trying to support Pilates 
pseudo-science.>

Trevor Allen:

<<My comments made NO reference to Pilates, only to muscle physiology. . . >>

***Correct - the name there should have been Simon Mesner and your name 
appeared there because of all that confusion over Liz Williams' posting  on 
your behalf.   The same applies in several other cases where you and Mesner 
were confused in that collage of postings.  My apologies if I took your name 
in vain elsewhere.

Trevor Allen:

<<Your original claim was that it is during the isometric phase, not during
eccentric action that tension in the muscle complex reaches its greatest
value. To explain this phenomenon with the F-V relation, you would have
basically turn it upside down, not prove it is more linear than hyperbolic.
That is, for on the lengthening side of the F-V relation (beyond zero
velocity) force goes down rather than up.   Every force record i have ever
seen in my own research shows maximumum eccentric muscle force increasing
above isometric force, which is supported by others (eg. Woledge '85,
Energetic aspects of muscle contraction). >>

Mel Siff:

***Actually, I stated EXPLOSIVE isometrics - as imposed by impulsive loading 
at the end of a sharply amortised eccentric action, not gradual onset 
isometrics.  Please see that Bosco reference that I quoted before and work 
done by Dr Verkhoshansky on this (Siif MC & Verkhoshansky  YV  
"Supertraining"  1999).  Here is Bosco's reference again - I am sure that you 
did not read it before making the above remarks.  

Bosco C (1982) Physiological considerations of strength and explosive power 
and jumping drills "Proc of Conference '82: Planning for Elite Performance", 
Canadian T&F Assoc Ottawa, 1-5 Aug 1982: 27-37. 

Trevor Allen:

<<To be honest i have never seen a muscle force record during the 
stretch-shortening cycle to see this actually happens, if you can provide a 
reference I would like to look it up.    I think the stretch-shortening
phenomenon is a very interesting area, and if things happen as you say I 
would like to understand it from what we know of muscle physiology. >>

Mel Siff:

***Besides the work by Bosco, one of my MSc students did part of his 
dissertation on this topic, using special myotonometer that I designed to 
non-invasively measure muscle tension during various types of concentric, 
eccentric and 'plyometric' actions.  

Kirkby A (1998)  Biomechanical Analysis of the Relation between Joint Torque 
and Muscle Tension for different Modes of Muscle Contraction   Unpubl MSc  
School of Mech Eng, University of the Witwatersrand, S Africa  

Zatsiorsky V M & Matveev E N (1964)  Force-velocity relationships in throwing 
 Teoriya I Praktika  Fizischeskoi Kultury (Theory & Practice of Physical 
Culture) 27(8): 24-28

Zatsiorsky V.M. (1997) The Review is Nice.  I Disagree with It.  J of Applied 
Biomechs  13, 479-483,   This entire Journal issue is a special on 
stretch-shortening and well worth studying.

In addition, there is a considerable amount of work on the topic of 
stretch-shortening by Komi, Haekinnen and several other Finnish researchers, 
as well as many by Verkhoshansky and Zatsiorsky.

Many of your subsequent comments on my comments appear to involve a great 
deal of semantic and definition differences that have occurred since we are 
unable to have immediate feedback in person.  I think that we both realise 
this fact, as do many others on this group, since we have all studied or 
researched them over the years.   For instance, of course, I agree with you 
that stretching of tissues in a full squat position is very different from 
stretching imposed at other angles of the knee.  Etcetera, etcetera.

I certainly see where you have misinterpreted me and I am sure that you have 
noted the same with me. That is why I chose to focus on what appear to be the 
major differences of understanding that we have over certain aspects of 
muscle action.

However, since the original discussion began with my request for proof of the 
statement that Pilates training produces longer muscles than other forms of 
training, I would still like to see someone try to apply muscle physilogy to 
substantiate this claim. 

I have received numerous comments on Pilates from various folk all over the 
world (some quite uncomplimentary), but they all announce that Pilates is 
great, wonderful, safe, has its place in training, that not everyone likes 
weights or aerobics, but not a single person has addressed the problem of 
misleading and unscientific claims being made for Pilates.  So far, that is 
telling me a lot about what Pilates folk don't know about Pilates foundations 
and physiology!

Dr Mel C Siff
Denver, USA
[log in to unmask]



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
December 2023
October 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
December 2022
October 2022
September 2022
May 2022
December 2021
November 2021
August 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
September 2020
July 2020
April 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager