> Under Subject: Classification
> I've said a few times and never got an answer as to why it wasn't
> included, that it is an obvious omission that LCC (Library of Congress
> Classification scheme) is not included when the other large
> classification
> schemes are. Please add it. It's not even controversial.
>
> Rebecca
I responded to this point in
http://www.mailbase.ac.uk/lists/dc-usage/2000-02/0044.html and received no
comment.
If this group believe this is not controversial, than please provide the
necessary information (label, description, uri, etc.) so that we can more
accurately vote on it.
eric
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|