> From: Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]>, 9 Mar 2000 22:02:48
> ...
> I'd be happy to see this usage of Identifier go as well - though I'd
> prefer to see the vote to include the current Identifier 'token' as the
> Name, e.g.
I like the idea of reducing the number of tokens and redundancy, but
rather than "Name" I'd prefer "Label", which connotes its lexical role
and would be consistent with RFC 2413. This means that the current
37) Is Part Of
Name: Is Part Of
Identifier: isPartOf
Definition: The described resource is a physical or logical
part of the referenced resource.
would simplify, without loss of information, to
37) Is Part Of
Label: isPartOf
Definition: The described resource is a physical or logical
part of the referenced resource.
The change would be consistent with the published RFC's terminology
while remaining consistent with ISO 11179 presentation style.
Above all, it's simple and clear.
-John
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|