>As a means forward, I'd like to suggest that we promote the less contentious
>parts of the pre-ballot document into the balloting system so everyone can
>take a look at this and begin to start the official voting round. If this
>seems like a partial way forward, please respond to the list indicating
>this...
I sure would like to not do this. The balloting is so confusing already,
dealing with partial ballots is a complication I don't think we need. It
sure would be easier for everyone if we could just get the whole thing up
in one piece, with one set of instructions, and one deadline.
>As for the CCP/Agent portion of the ballot, there still seems to be two
>potential ways of approaching this.
>
>v1) http://rdf.dev.oclc.org/dc/dcqballot/DCQBallot-20000304.html
>
>and
>
>v2) http://rdf.dev.oclc.org/dc/dcqballot/DCQBallot-20000308.html
>
>Please (ASAP) respond and provide justification for which position should be
>included in the official ballot.
v2, please please please.
p
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|