I'll respond to Erik's points in a seperate email message, but to everyone
on the usage list *please* cite the document that your're referring. We
have two *different* proposals on the table.
eric
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jul,Erik [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2000 3:13 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]; Miller,Eric
> Subject: RE: DCQBallot Agent wg modification
>
>
> Eric:
>
> #6 Identifier should be "period" (lowercase)
> #8 Definition: "Temporal characteristics of the intellectual
> content of the
> resource."
>
> What does the definition mean? I don't understand it.
>
> #11 Definition: Spatial characteristics of the intellectual
> content of the
> resource.
>
> I don't understand this definition either. What is a "spatial
> characteristic"?
>
> #17 Identifier: POINT. Why all caps?
>
> #25, #40 I asked this question before, and I ask it again:
> Why do we list
> "URI" and the type of identifier encoding schemes and not specific
> instances. The referenced document is for a generic syntax,
> a URI, but as
> far as I can tell there is not such thing as a URI, but there are such
> things as URLs.
>
> #47-#59 Identifiers should be lowercase
>
> #60-#72 I do not like the way the ballot is presenting this.
> Why can we not
> separate Creator, Contributor, and Publisher and list the
> qualifiers that
> pertain to each? I will vote NO to all of these agent
> proposals if they are
> presented in this manner.
>
> --Erik
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|