Ren,
First, congrats on your new position. Must be exciting.
Second, I'm still confused by what DCMES 2.0 is. Less than 15 elements,
more than 15 elements, a different 15 elements?
Carl
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Renato Iannella [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2000 8:04 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Roles, what the vote should be - was Re:
> Preballot document
> for review (fwd)
>
>
>
> --On 3/3/00 1:36 PM +0000 Andy Powell wrote:
>
> > For the record... that means that I support the introduction of a
> > shortened list of Agent element qualifiers (Illustrator,
> ...), based on
> > the list developed by Rebecca, for this voting round.
> >
> > I tend to agree with Simon that the current list is too
> library-centric
> > (and would certainly support Owner and Collector from his list above
> > because we use them in projects here!).
>
> This is *WHY* the Agent WG proposed a Role qualifier with a number
> of community specific vocabularies - because Roles *ARE* community
> specific.
>
> The Usage Committee has the right to reject the work of any element
> WG. It does not have the right to develop *new* semantics.
>
> Again, lets vote on the *Element WG proposals* and get on with
> the more important work of DCMES 2.0...
>
>
> Cheers...Renato <http://purl.net/net/renato>
> Chief Scientist, IPR Systems <http://www.iprsystems.com>
>
>
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|