--On 3/3/00 1:36 PM +0000 Andy Powell wrote:
> For the record... that means that I support the introduction of a
> shortened list of Agent element qualifiers (Illustrator, ...), based on
> the list developed by Rebecca, for this voting round.
>
> I tend to agree with Simon that the current list is too library-centric
> (and would certainly support Owner and Collector from his list above
> because we use them in projects here!).
This is *WHY* the Agent WG proposed a Role qualifier with a number
of community specific vocabularies - because Roles *ARE* community
specific.
The Usage Committee has the right to reject the work of any element
WG. It does not have the right to develop *new* semantics.
Again, lets vote on the *Element WG proposals* and get on with
the more important work of DCMES 2.0...
Cheers...Renato <http://purl.net/net/renato>
Chief Scientist, IPR Systems <http://www.iprsystems.com>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|