--On 23/3/00 7:24 AM -0500 Miller,Eric wrote:
>> --On 22/3/00 11:28 AM -0500 Miller,Eric wrote:
>>
>> > Thus for any data element defined by the DCMI we would have
>> as an example:
>> >
>> > Label: Is Part Of
>> > Definition: The described resource is a physical or logical...
>> > Qualifier Type: Element Refinement
>> > Name: isPartOf
>> > Namespace: http://purl.org/dc/eor/2000/03/13/dc-realtion#
>>
>> I assume Label and Title should be swapped around?
>
> not sure...
whoops, I meant Label and Name should be swapped above?
> If you're referring to ISO11179 as the international standard in this
> context, than I would suggest our own. Again, ISO11179 is vague on the
> areas where we want to be very explicit.
You need to explain what is vague about "Identifier" and what is
not-so-vague about "Label".
Cheers...Renato <http://purl.net/net/renato>
Chief Scientist, IPR Systems <http://www.iprsystems.com>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|