Point well taken and with which I partly agree. However (please don't
clobber me, Musici) ineffable ideas, meaning may be intuited from a
picture whereas music conveys pure feeling.
KW
[log in to unmask] wrote:
>
> >KW wrote:"...perhaps the mystic experience is simply too ineffable
> >for pictorial
> >exposition."
> >.... Pictorial art is perhaps the only means of
> >expressing that which cannot be named."
> >KW
>
> ______
> KW:
> In no way to diminish your observation on the unique powers
> of 'pictorial art', but in defense of other worlds...
> What of the unnameable vocabulary and architechtonic domains
> of pure sounds... Music. To name/express that which 'cannot be named'
> with objects and images that can be named, even if the composite sum
> remains unnameable, seems no more, and sometimes a bit less capable
> of such expressions than pure sounds which have no such grounded ties.
> Josef
>
> Josef Gulka
> [log in to unmask]
> Tel: 215- 732-8420
> Fax (215) 732-8420
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|