On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Rebecca S. Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Miller,Eric wrote:
>
> > Agreed on the need from implementers... please remember, however, we're
> > simply voting on an encoding scheme named 'DCT1', not the values associated
> > with this.
>
> News to me. I thought we considered the contents of the DCT1 list what we
> are voting for. How can one vote for a scheme called DCT1 without
> considering what's in it? What would that accomplish?
Yes, agreed. I'm sure the WG members felt that it was the list that would
be voted on, not just the string 'DCT1'.
In the case of Format, we (well I) explicitly decided against a vote on
DCF1 because we couldn't agree on the list of terms.
Andy
--
Distributed Systems and Services
UK Office for Library and Information Networking
University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK Voice: +44 1225 323933
www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/a.powell Fax: +44 1225 826838
Resource Discovery Network - www.rdn.ac.uk
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|