> i wonder if we enjoy talking about poetry and the process of
> writing/reading/interacting, these days, more than(or just as much) as the
> actual poem?
komninos
who is this 'we'? Altho' these ancillary acts you entable are necessary, and
supportive to the creative process, holding up the entranced one, as it
were, they're not comparable in quality of feeling. I do wonder whether your
point is influenced by an academic background - it's not that I don't talk
about 'it' a lot, but that talk is part of my general speechstream, my
onflooding kerbabble, from which the poems surface, wet and glistening like
divers.
I mean by this the read poetry too, the messages received.
david bircumshaw
----- Original Message -----
From: komninos zervos <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: spatial geography
> i wonder if we enjoy talking about poetry and the process of
> writing/reading/interacting, these days, more than(or just as much) as the
> actual poem?
> i wonder also has this discourse in the present continuous emerged as
> another genre made possible by the spatiotemporal experience of mediated
> discussion groups like this? is this a circular argument?
>
> komninos
> komninos's cyberpoetry site http://student.uq.edu.au/~s271502
> cyberpoet@slv site http://www.experimedia.vic.gov.au/cyberpoet/
> komninos zervos, tel. +61 7 55 948602
> lecturer in cyberstudies,
> school of arts,
> gold coast campus,
> griffith university,
> pmb 50, gold coast mail centre
> queensland, 9726
> australia.
>
|