Seems many interesting points have been made on the subject over the last
few days, which I've missed seeing as my Web Server went on malfunctioning
vacation.
Question of Morality
Morality as system, as unassailable truth - the which Nietzsche set himself
against - is Kantian Reason presided over by the Gott von moralitaaet , i.e.
secular, absolute, Reason. It's as arbitrary and dominating to me as it
would be to you or anyone.
However, Ermina:
"On the other hand, I do not like at all the idea
of being moral. It causes me problems, in and out of bed.
Personally, I feel that when everything is over, I want to go home.
Melancholy prevents me from keeping going. I am incapable of insincerity."
'being moral'? - The question of integral morality is a moot one; but
'morality', taken in its broadest span, is inevitable, as being, in such a
wide comprehension, merely the existence of others made a question for the
self - in so far as 'anthro/pos phusei politikon zo/on' one is, equally, a
moral animal ( though the former is countered by the totalitarianism of the
Sadean ego.....) - morality, if anything, is caught up with our living, our,
shall we say, 'being'; it is not an 'idea' that we can abstract ourselves
from....
It ought to cause you problems - the question, in large reckoning, is
whether it causes 'us' problems....
Sincerus? None of us are sincere, solely, as none of us, equally, are
insincere - purity is no ready commodity...
CGHughes
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|