---- [log in to unmask] wrote:
>
> bill flavell writes, in his usual moderate tone:
>
> This is so far out in left field I don't even know
> how
> to respond. It's patently obvious that YOU don't
> have any
> cinematic specificity. Why bother to be on this mailing
> list then?
>
> and again:
>
> Well, this is a film philosophy mailing list,
> and the
> largest film-specific theory/aesthetics/philosophy
> list
> that I know of. And anybody who denies the specificity
> of
> the cinema is definitely gonna hear from me.
>
> this all hardly deserves comment except perhaps the suggestion
> that this thread ought to be torn
Well, go cry to the list moderator/moderators if you
want to. It's certainy your privelege. I'm sure I've been
booted off more mailing lists than you've ever subscribed
to.
Bill Flavell
___________________________________________________________________
To get your own FREE ZDNet Onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax,
all in one place - sign up today at http://www.zdnetonebox.com
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|