JMC0) "The question is posed in terms of the referent: What is the referent?"
MOC 0) "Is this really necessary?"
ATMOC0) What is really necessary?
MOC 1) "In a film that alternates between B&W and color the assumed "real"
position (if there were one) could be presented by either. "
ATMOC 1) Yes. Depends on the framing. What comes to attention.
MOC 2) "What was more "real" in that case would be determined by the way the
piece was put together. I mean really....."
ATMOC 2) Yes. Depends on the framing. What comes to attention.
MOC 3) "Further, to say that B&W has more veracity because it's more
"original" (by "original" I assume you mean because it was invented first)
is a bit goofy."
ATMOC 3) Maybe, maybe not. It fits the definition. (Yes.)
MOC 4) "Is a covered wagon more real then an automobile?" The covered wagon was
invented first so I guess so.... "
ATMOC 4) a) Depends on the sense of "real." b) My discussion is in terms of
same, but advanced technology. Your analogy is off base. A better analogy would
be the Roadster and the re-invented Chrysler roadster. c) Depends on the
environment. In an 1870s setting, the covered wagon. . . .
MOC 5) Also, your choice of the word "original" is misleading and suggests an ad
hominem defense.
ATMOC 5) Your claims need to reference an example. They don't have intrinsic
sense.
JMC
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|