Robin,
>Even if it did, there's another reason for not using "dble" to change the type
>of this constant (particularly if it is in the executable section of the
>program) --
>
>"dble" may require a function evaluation. 3.1541926d0 does not.
Why? Do you know any compiler that would -- even the lamentable Powerstation?
We have had mixed mode arithmetic for ages.
Regards, Paddy
Paddy O'Brien,
Transmission Development,
TransGrid,
PO Box A1000, Sydney South,
NSW 2000, Australia
Tel: +61 2 9284-3063
Fax: +61 2 9284-3050
Email: [log in to unmask]
Either "\'" or "\s" (to escape the apostrophe) seems to work for most people,
but that little whizz-bang apostrophe gives me little spam.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|