Nils Smeds wrote:
> That is my other wanted feature: the compiler option -noimplicit that would
> flag errors for all procedure/function calls that has no explicit interface.
> Most compilers has this option for variables today, but it would be an even
> better feature if it was expanded to also control procedure references.
The compiler feature duplicates a language feature, viz. IMPLICIT NONE.
It would be useful also to have a variation on the IMPLICIT NONE statement,
or a statement of similar functionality, that controls this.
Van Snyder
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|