Nils Smeds wrote: > That is my other wanted feature: the compiler option -noimplicit that would > flag errors for all procedure/function calls that has no explicit interface. > Most compilers has this option for variables today, but it would be an even > better feature if it was expanded to also control procedure references. The compiler feature duplicates a language feature, viz. IMPLICIT NONE. It would be useful also to have a variation on the IMPLICIT NONE statement, or a statement of similar functionality, that controls this. Van Snyder %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%