JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ENVIROETHICS Archives


ENVIROETHICS Archives

ENVIROETHICS Archives


enviroethics@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ENVIROETHICS Home

ENVIROETHICS Home

ENVIROETHICS  2000

ENVIROETHICS 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

RE: Pop-ecology and two views of obfuscation

From:

David Pearson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:29:54 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (62 lines)

Subject: 
          For moderation - RE: Pop-ecology and two views of obfuscation
    Date: 
          Wed, 16 Aug 2000 23:45:34 +1200
   From: 
          "Chris Perley" <[log in to unmask]>
      To: 
          [log in to unmask]




Jim Lewis wrote : (in reply to my obfuscation)

> >I consider myself on the Leopoldian side, and have tried to
> focus my efforts
> >on belonging to the land community, rather than forcing the land
> to adapt to
> >the human community.  I find Robert Costanza's idea that "if we
> are ever to
> >find workable long-term solutions to our environmental problems,
> we need a
> >completely new conception of the relationship between economics
> and ecology,
> >one that regards the economic subsystem as a part of the learger
> ecological
> >life-support system" to be right on the mark.  Now all we need are people
> >who don't automatically say "that's impossible" but get to work to find a
> >way to make it happen.
> >
> >I'm not sure if that makes me a "preservationist" or not, but it
> certainly
> >does make me one who thinks business as usual, and "fixing"
> solutions via a
> >PR firm rather than actual work, won't do.

Chris Perley here: I don't have any problems with this snip from the bottom
of your "obfuscation" post.  In fact, it accords with some of the things
some of us have been saying: i.e. - focus on solutions - and don't leave
humans out of the equation.  It doesn't sound preservationist to me - yet
the ripostes you posted above this final statement appeared to be in
contradiction with this view.   I also have a lot of sympathy with
ecological economic.  But note that ecological economics involves HUMANS.

Your comment about needing "people who don't automatically say "that's
impossible" but get to work to find a way to make it happen" is also
something a number of us have been arguing for.  This is not preservationism
Jim (as I understand it).  But so often it IS "preservationism" that is
closed to any involvement between humans and trees or animals (or
whatever) - believing humans to involve ecological harm all the time.  When
someone suggests an ecologically sensitive management of a forest there are
always those who will be opposed because it doesn't accord with their
"beliefs".  And those who support the initiative are termed environmental
traitors, anti-environmentalists and industry apologists.

So who are the people saying "that's impossible"?

Chris P


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
May 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
October 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
July 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
October 2008
September 2008
July 2008
June 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
October 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager