Clive Page <[log in to unmask]> writes:
> I _could_ use the ISO_VARYING_STRING module, but there are reports of
> memory leaks in some circumstances, and I suspect I'd find them hard to
> avoid.
I'm not up-to-date on this, but two comments (either or both of which
might be completely incorrect).
While the original version had memory leaks, isn't there a better one
now?
Isn't the source code just an EXAMPLE? Haven't vendors implemented this
internally, without memory leaks?
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|