Dear Hans,
Yes, your message made it to the list (and I am replying to the list
too).
I think that you are right. We never had so many messages in such a
short period and we owe it all to Jim. So, why don't you tell us what
you have to say about book history? You were missed at STS and I am
sure that others are curious about your opinions too.
Best,
BB
On 22 Mar 2007, at 19:45, Hans Walter Gabler wrote:
> It is true, of course, that the old settings were the source of
> potential tickles. So, if the occasional mis-hitter can live with
> the ensuing embarrassment, let's keep the old ones. Actually: isn't
> the list at the moment livening up no end, thanks to Jim?! But I am
> curious whether this message will in fact be going to the list. I
> did the replacing (haphazardly from one of the individual messages
> of this evening) in the "To" line -- but whether I am using the
> correct address remains to be seen ...
>
> Best wishes all round, Hans Gabler.
|