On 06/06/2011 08:38, Martin Bly wrote:
> Does this not just bear out that the 'average' HS06 assigned by the sites to their farms is poor and/or that the spread of performance per core is wide on a given farm?
>
> Martin.
I think the second. This is an attempt to assign a single number to a
site when it is not possible due to the etherogeneity of the hardware
and the way sys admins configure the fair share. Manchester hepspecs are
inline with other sites on hepix so they are not poorly assigned still
we get the lowest of the two numbers becuase it is possible that steve
jobs run mostly on the slowest nodes where the majority of users jobs
are redirected. This is assuming HS06/event = const assumption is even a
correct one.
cheers
alessandra
|