Oddly enough I don't want to reconfigure a site just to run something
that doesn't work ? Why don't the people who write this software have
a test suite for the most common batch systems ? It's just basic good
practise. And even if I report a bug, there is actually not
necessarily anybody to fix it, just look at the crap that goes on with
the cream-ce and sge. I've more than debugged this one and I am not
even an EA for this.
Also, glexec/Argus: For a long time it wasn't even clear we would run
it at all (at least that was Imperial stance). The WLCG decisions are
subject to change (I sat out the "SCAS mandatory" stage), I actually
looked at ARGUS (I installed a machine and all), but back then it was
just 'you can't use it' and that was that, so yes, I waited to see how
it would pan out, for actually start messing with it.
I'll go and do some work now.
Daniela
On 23 March 2011 12:50, Stephen Burke <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Sam Skipsey [mailto:[log in to unmask]] said:
>> this is why we had the PPS, and have the nth iteration of that now
>> with the current Early Adopter system.)
>
> Indeed - so how many SGE sites have volunteered to be EAs for glexec?!
>
> Stephen
>
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask]
HEP Group/Physics Dep
Imperial College
Tel: +44-(0)20-75947810
http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/~dbauer/
|