Fist of all I'm sorry that I couldn't have time to check my mails
because of the high working tempo.
I think its very important to chose change strategy. Because both cases
you may face with problems.
If you want to manage your organization by process, or strategies, or
projects you will need to change your organizational structure. If you
change that as a relution you will see a high resistance to change. In
that case you need to prepare people to incoming change. This may need
enrich skills of people. At least people have learn why they need to
change, how it will go on and what they will be. Also one of the
important thing is that we have to change habits, especially ones that
will endanger the transformation process. These need to be in an
evolutionary process. However, if you chose an evolutionary process
people will encounter with both the old and the new systems. I think,
the trick at that case chosing the timing. When will we change the
habits, when will we change the organizational structure ...etc?
Because of the problems that people see both systems characteristics at
the same time, this forces us to thing "Is a revolution needed?"
Evolution process will bring a long resistance time. If you don't chose
right strategies to get rid of resistance. Otherwise revulution will be
necessary, despite its powerfull resistance.
>I will share that some change needs an evolutionary process, while
others
>needs a revolutionary process. The choice of the process is a function
of
>the context acting on the organisation, its people and the leader.
>Revolutionary change is quick and effective than the evolutionary
process.
>Key transformation areas should not be subjected to evolutionary
process.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|