JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  February 2013

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING February 2013

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: performance and "network"

From:

Barnaby Dicker <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Barnaby Dicker <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 6 Feb 2013 21:48:32 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (91 lines)

Dear all,

picking up on this thread of gender - Could contributors say something about their experiences of gender balance/equality in their creative networks (as opposed to social networking)? Where are we now?

One challenge I am aware of relates to the needs of young children - sometimes this imposes a certain, shall we say, division of labour.
Its great to imagine child rearing as a fluid part of creative adult lives - and sometimes it is - but in my experience, children need their own space(s), attention, routine, peer groups. And equally the demands of a project can exclude children. Consequently, domestic creative partnerships have to decide how to share parental/artistic duties.

I encounter lots of women involved in both arts and academia. Most of my 'bosses' are women. I encounter many less men openly or visibly suspicious or hostile to women. And they rather stand out when they appear. 

Is it is ok/possible to openly have little time for someone's work or approach regardless of gender, age, nationality, etc. and not be branded a chauvinist etc.?

My aspiration is that 'the network' - arising for me explicitly each year for Art's Birthday - can be fully inclusive. I find that the idea already works 'magnetically' - attracting some, repelling others.
 
Bottom line for me: the network is formed through self-election. (But that's not to say that we can't have invitation based discussion groups.)

B


________________________________
 From: Dorothee Richter <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] 
Sent: Wednesday, 6 February 2013, 19:54
Subject: Re: [NEW-MEDIA-CURATING] performance and  "network"
 
Dear All, I would like to come back to Fluxus and gender, we finalized the
chapter in our Fluxus Film today: I must say, as always things are
complicated, Carolee Schneemann critzied in a famous poetry the way the
Fluxus (male) artists were behaving and excluding her work and her,
Maciunas had obviously some problems with the strong women artists Carolee
and Charlotte Moorman, but he invited many japanese women artists to join,
with yoko Ono he had a fight over the realization of a piece for now here
in 1971. ON the other hand did many fluxus artists made an interesting
contribution on the flux in gender issues, Maciuans celebrated his wedding
with cross dressing events and many other performances, Geoffrey Hendricks
and Bici Hendircks performed their flux divorce, Maciunas himself made
photos of his cross dressing experiences and so on, homosexuality was a
topic, some men did engage a lot more then usual into the upbringing of
the children Š. So Fluxus provided a lot of different approaches towards
issues around sexuality but the group was founded on a male community.
Alison Knowles got inside through her husband Dick Higgins as the fist
women to be connected to fluxusŠ. Therefore, but not only therefor I am
very reluctant to put any fluxus artist again into the postion of a male
genius, even if art history and art market usually tends to reestablish
these roles so easily. This we should all keep in mind - and think about
the revolutionary impetus of Fluxus and how this could be re interpreted
nowadays. - In a way it should go way beyond establishing networks, the
political drive (ieven if Fluxus artists never agreed on it) was an
important part of the agenda. So let's talk about agency and access more,
best, Dorothee
-- 



Am 06.02.13 20:27 schrieb "Johannes Birringer" unter
<[log in to unmask]>:

>dear all
>
>
>well, this is the zen half month, and soon the new year will start,
>but as the discussion was coming quickly to penetrating close ups of
>Robert Filliou (? had not heard of before) and a so-called 'eternal
>network' 
>and fluxus, I suddenly remembered that I was posting here, on January 13
>& 15,  on a fluxus performance by Patterson, at CAM Houston,  in the
>context of asking
>about curatorial politics and policies regarding performance's relation
>to new media and the network....... and the then-discussion stopped dead
>in its tracks
>and never continued.
>
>This has happened before, and so gather it was a coincidence, and had
>nothing to do with boring folks on this list with questions coming from
>performance pesrepctive, rather
>than new media art?
>
>
>respectfully
>
>Johannes Birringer
>dap-lab, londo
>
>PS  keep them coming, the Zen sayings, Ken.
>________________________________________
>From: Curating digital art -
> 
>Clive schreibt
>I am pretty well conditioned not to write about white, male, heterosexual
>artists or theorists - it must be this Fluxus stuff that is causing me to
>fall off the wagon?

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager