I tend to agree. I think providing the user with a choice of CoIs,
either through showing different endpoints or service names or similar,
is perhaps the best we can do for now
David
On 27/05/2014 10:01, Josh Howlett wrote:
> Yes I agree; but absent a scenario it is difficult to know how to construct an appropriate solution. In this particular case I don't think it is obvious how best to plug this into the architecture.
>
> Josh.
>
>> Its a wise person who can envisage all future uses of a technology
>>
>> On 26/05/2014 17:30, Josh Howlett wrote:
>>>> I dont see how the RP proxy
>>>> can know what the user wants to do, unless it is implicit in the
>>>> workflow or chosen resource
>>>
>>> Can you think of a scenario where this isn't implicit (or where it can't be
>> reasonably effected)?
>>>
>>> Josh.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Janet(UK) is a trading name of Jisc Collections and Janet Limited, a
>>> not-for-profit company which is registered in England under No.
>>> 2881024 and whose Registered Office is at Lumen House, Library Avenue,
>>> Harwell Oxford, Didcot, Oxfordshire. OX11 0SG. VAT No. 614944238
>>>
>
> Janet(UK) is a trading name of Jisc Collections and Janet Limited, a
> not-for-profit company which is registered in England under No. 2881024
> and whose Registered Office is at Lumen House, Library Avenue,
> Harwell Oxford, Didcot, Oxfordshire. OX11 0SG. VAT No. 614944238
>
|