Mike Gill wrote:
>Peter – for many amateurs, describing looking at a site, cogitating about it
>and measuring it as archaeology is a turn off. Why not stick to terms they
>are at ease with.
I would be grateful Mike if you could expound a little further on this. As an undergraduate amateur I am left wondering what terms I should be at ease with?
As for the rest, well, thanks for the details of 'what went on'. Dare I say it 'he bias of a northerner's?
regards,
Trevor
Also at:
[log in to unmask]
This email has been scanned for Virus, Worms & Trojans, and found to be free of any infection.
Symantec Virus Check & Zone Alarm Professional Protection.
|