Thanks for the answer Antun,
so it "safe" NOT to alter the downtime period in order to wait for
the node to disappear.
Regards,
Christos
On May 10, 2008, at 1:02 PM, Antun Balaz wrote:
> Hi Christos,
>
> The node will eventually disappear from SAM, after some retention
> period. It
> should be 3 days - if it is longer than that, you should open a
> ticket to SAM
> team to fix this. If you have put the node in downtime before
> removing it from
> GOCDB, COD should not see alarms for failed SAM tests during the
> retention
> period, so you should not get tickets for this node...
>
> Best luck, Antun
>
> -----
> Antun Balaz
> Research Assistant
> E-mail: [log in to unmask]
> Web: http://scl.phy.bg.ac.yu/
>
> Phone: +381 11 3713152
> Fax: +381 11 3162190
>
> Scientific Computing Laboratory
> Institute of Physics Belgrade
> Pregrevica 118, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia
> -----
>
>
> ---------- Original Message -----------
> From: Christos Triantafyllidis <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Sat, 10 May 2008 12:41:52 +0300
> Subject: [LCG-ROLLOUT] Removing a node from a site
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> i'm trying to remove an old node from our site without success.
>> I have removed the node from both GOCDB and sBDII but it still gets
>> monitored by SAM tests. Do i miss something? Is it possible that
>> this behavior is "normal" because the site is in scheduled downtime
>> and at the beginning of the downtime the node was on both GOCDB and
>> sBDII?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christos
> ------- End of Original Message -------
>
|