Maria Dimou-Zacharova wrote:
>On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Oscar Koeroo wrote:
>
>
>
>>EGEE BROADCAST wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>------
>>>Publication from : Maria Dimou 7577 <[log in to unmask]> (DTEAM)
>>>This mail has been sent using the broadcasting tool available at
>>>http://cic.in2p3.fr
>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>------
>>>
>>>The database server that hosts all VOMS data will be down next Monday
>>>(5th-dec) at 9:30am for a change of an, apparently faulty, drive. The
>>>duration of the interruption is estimated to be up to 90 minutes.
>>>
>>>Thank you for your understanding
>>>- maria dimou / grid deployment
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Hi Maria,
>>
>>Just to be critical to the Oracle back-end in stead of the MySQL back-end for
>>the VOMS services, but wasn't it the general idea of moving to Oracle so that
>>'just a faulty drive' wouldn't mean that the VOMS Server would be down for 6+
>>VOs?
>>
>>
>
> Beste Oscar,
>
>I have no control on the Oracle db servers. If they say they have to
>replace a drive, I guess they have to do it.
>
>I am happy to relay your criticism and I will.
>https://uimon.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LCG/LcgScmStatusAas is the location
>where I report VOMS operational things. Please bookmark the page because
>our next meeting and relevant report won't be until the 14th of Dec.
>
>I don't see why you write to the whole of the rollout list, though.
>
>Regards
> - maria
>
>
>
Beste Maria,
It was a criticism focused on the Oracle db backend not VOMS in anyway.
I'm not saying that Oracle is bad in anyway, but I wish to point out
that using a Oracle db service doesn't mean that your database is as
persistent as some might think. ;-)
>>cheers,
>>
>> Oscar
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
|