Hi All.
Recently we've been seeing an increasing amount of deposits where the author claims to have no author prepared copy because they have been encouraged/told to use either publisher templates or publisher's online tools to edit their articles from an early stage. This clearly diminishes the chance of an author prepared copy at the end of the publication process and so we can't archive (even where the publisher 'allows' deposit of author copy).
Has this been noted or dicussed elsewhere and if so are there proposed paths forward?
Thanks,
Fran
|