Dear all,
In Bucks we are just begining to formulate SMR spatial recording policies
with a view to developing an updated SMR manual. We are trying to think
through such issues as the desirability (or otherwise!) of multiple
overlapping polygons, how polygons (and points!) display in general
distribution maps, and how comprehensible the use of different symbols is to
members of the public.
There is some advice in 'Informing the Future of the Past', although much of
it is rehearsing the pro & cons of general approaches, and I've not looked
at the ADS 'Guide to Good Practice'...yet.
Has anyone developed a policy on recording monuments (in particular) as
polygons? If so, what is your policy?
Please reply on or off forum.
Julia Wise
Archaeological Officer
County Archaeological Service
Buckinghamshire County Council
**** Buckinghamshire County Council E-mail Disclaimer ****
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient, the use of the information by disclosure, copying
or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
received this email in error please notify the system manager
at [log in to unmask]
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been
swept by MailSweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
**** End of Disclaimer *********************************************
|