but at this point isn't gendlin more viable as the philosopher of
embodied knowing?
On 7/27/11, gareth somers <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Augustine started the rot all those years ago.. and I haven't encountered
> one yet but never say never!
>
> --- On Wed, 27/7/11, ellie epp <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> From: ellie epp <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: Lonergan
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date: Wednesday, 27 July, 2011, 16:44
>
> can any theologian who writes to prove the existence of god be
> relevant to embodiment studies?
>
> On 7/27/11, Adrian Harris <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Have any of you explored the work of Bernard Lonergan, notably/Insight:
>> A Study of Human Understanding/? I'm asking as part of my response to an
>> enquiry posted to my blog - see below. Bill is clearly very excited by
>> Lonergan's work but I'm after a broader set of opinions.
>>
>>> I have recently become interested in embodiment of "mind" so-called thru
>>> reading Lakoff and Johnson (1999). I will spare you my meanderings
>>> across
>>> the internet both prior and subsequent to L and J, by saying that my
>>> starting point was Bernard Lonergan's seminal work "Insight" (Toronto: U
>>> of Tronto Press, 1957 et seq.) Lonergan (1904-1984) was so good that
>>> like Heideggar he has left a circle of disciples, both across Europe and
>>> North America (B.L. was a lifelong Canadian). Have you heard of
>>> Lonergan? Do you have colleagues or contacts in the Conitive Embodiment
>>> movement in any way who have studied Lonergan and see the connections
>>> between him and it? No kidding, they are there--ripe fruit for the
>>> picking...
>>> My best wishes to you,
>>> Bill Bendzick
>>
>> http://www.adrianharris.org/blog/2011/06/the-cognitive-iceberg/#comment-319
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Adrian
>>
>
|